uruloki’s lair

At least, that’s the idea I get from the subtitle on an MSNBC article about the Vote for Change Tour.

Stars risk the wrath of partisan fans with Vote for Change tour

The article is actually ok, analyzing some of the pros and cons of doing politcal tours instead of straight music. It also acknowledges that in most cases, the rockers are preaching to the choir:

Indeed, the Vote for Change Tour might provide gathering spots for the like-minded, but it’s doubtful it will convince undecided voters to select John Kerry or to vote against George W. Bush. The vast majority of fans who buy tickets to these concerts will do so because they already agree with Springsteen & Company’s stump speech, and are willing to fork over their hard-earned green to support the cause. It’s the “Fahrenheit 9/11” Syndrome — the congregation is already devout.

One thing I didn’t like about the article was the way that the survey in the sidebar was worded.

1. This is America. They are free to voice their opinions. – 45%
2. I might not agree with their views, but that would not stop me from buying one of their albums. – 7%
3. If I disagree with their views, I would be less likely to buy their music. – 17%
4. Just shut up and play the music. – 31%

Specifically, I don’t think that 1 and 3 are exclusive. They have a right to voice their opinions (1), and I have the right to voice my opinon by not buying their music (3). Of course, I am a big fan of 4 as well, but some spoiled rich moronspeople seem to think that their opinion is the only one that matters and that we’re all idiots for caring about actual leadership in a time of war.

Tags: Entertainment //