Name calling?
Once again, some peoples’ sense of humour is nowhere to be found. After CO GOP candidate Pete Coors’ picture showed up at the top of a story of the KKK, the campaign said that it was “so outrageous it’s kind of funny. It could have been worse. Pete could have been identified as John Kerry.”
So the CO Terrorist Appeaser Democratic Party promptly demanded an apology, saying it was name calling. Apparently, their mother wasn’t able to console them and their self esteem was hurt. The next step, in case no apology is forthcoming, is the silent treatment, and possibly double-secret probation.
The danger, for the GOP at least, is that Coors could actually be identified as Kerry. Since Kerry has covered every base (e.g. waffled) on every issue, there is a subset of Kerry positions that could be identified as Coors. So, it very well could have been worse. They do seem to be taking a page from the one thing that someone never waffles about: “I’m not George Bush.”
I am not sure that comparing a Democratic candidate to a KKKer would be much of a distinction. They seem to hold the same idea on race being a prime factor in a person’s makeup, they just disagree on their expression (affirmative action, anyone?). The only difference is that (D) is acceptable no matter what they say, where KKK is (as it should be) strung up in most places.
I’m going to quit asking for the cheese, since certain national organizations seem to need all the cheese they can get to go with their w[h]ine party.
Discussion Area - Leave a Comment