« In the News… // Honor and dishonor »
The Free Market rules again…
Posted on September 16th, 2003 by uruloki
So, it turns out that no one watches women’s soccer, and they had to close the doors.
“A shortfall in sponsorship revenue and insufficient revenue from other core areas of the business proved to be the hurdles which the WUSA could not overcome in time for planning the 2004 season,” said John Hendricks, chairman of the WUSA board of governors.
Translation: not enough customers watched the matches to draw business, and selling 10s of Mia Hamm shirts wasn’t apparently enough. However, that is not the conclusion that the mainstream media is drawing. Labeling it the “most important story in Tuesday’s paper,” Graham Hayes of ESPN thinks that the demise of WUSA “leaves [a] void in sports.” Fortunately, the entire article, while bemoaning the loss, serves up the very reasons that it should have folded and highlights the problems. The WUSA was never just about the players on the league’s eight teams, or about who scored the most goals or made the most saves. It was about taking the gains achieved under Title IX and showing a younger generation what was possible.
Apparently, no where was it about making a product that people wanted, which is essential in America, the land of consumers. If it wasn’t about “who scored the most goals,” it missed that fundamental aspect of sports that is combat and competition: sports highlight the abilities and achievements of individuals within the context of a team. What do we remember about the NBA in the 90’s? Michael Jordan and the Bulls, not the Bulls featuring Michael Jordan. 90% of the people in the US couldn’t tell you who plays for the San Francisco Giants other than Barry Bonds. Hayes in fact admits that when he says, Girls—and boys, for that matter—should be able to see Abby Wambach score goals. They should be able to know who Hege Riise is or be able to watch Sissi in action.
But I thought it wasn’t about that? Hayes believes that WUSA provided something that was missing for young girls.Between every Sally Ride or Elizabeth Dole making a name for herself in science, politics, academics, there is a gaping void. A void that grows smaller every day, but a void nonetheless. But leagues like the WUSA and WNBA provide a venue for literally hundreds of recognizable faces of achievement in a field previously reserved for men.
I propose that it still does: a lesson in economics and reality. If people don’t want something, it should not be kept around to waste resources. If people want something, they don’t care who makes it, whether man, woman, or other division of interest. When a product blows through $100 million in 3 seasons, it may be time to reevaluate the business model. (Don’t use Amazon as an argument, even with an overall negative cash flow, is still moving billions of dollars worth of merchandise and equity. The overall losses are in low percentage points, while WUSA was nearly 90% loss.) When your initial investment is for a 5 year plan, and you blow it in 3, you have serious problems. Even commissioners from other women’s sports don’t support Haye’s contention that “some things are more important than the bottom line.”“Many people think that women’s sports is a cause as much as it is entertainment,” said Gary Cavalli, former commissioner of the ABL, the women’s basketball league that lost approximately $30 million throughout its three-year existence in the late ‘90s. “That you should show up at games to support the cause as much as you should show up because you enjoy the entertainment, I don’t think that’s fair.”
Of course, there isn’t any acknowledgement of the wonderful experiment that was WUSA, just more moaning about not enough positive examples for females in some area of life. I mean, America is so great that we spend $100 MILLION dollars for women to play soccer (not exactly the most popular sport in the US), which is close to the GDP of some countries (source). There’s more, but once again, I have done enough damage for one night.
Discussion Area - Leave a Comment